OCA Level 3: Body of Work/Contextual Studies

Category: Reflection

L3 Tutor Group: 27th September 2021

Notes from Contextual Studies Level 3 Tutor Group session on 27th September 2021 with Ariadne Xenou:

revision, redrafting, editing:


  • do at every stage
  • looking at things a different way
    • do you revise/pursue?
  • seeing afresh/anew
    • to drive forward
  • something new can appear which would mean need to revise what has been done
  • seeing draft through a new prism 
  • need to step outside our thoughts and see with new eyes
  • do the sentences mean what we intended?
    • introduce a new reader – imagine a new reader
    • try to see afresh
  • why do we need to revise so much?
    • might have missed the point – figure out what is missing
    • are you communicating effectively?
  • abstract ideas only take shape when we read and revise them
    • reconsider and do more
    • what works and what doesn’t – what does it need
    • more we do this more refined it is
  • dissonance 
    • conceptual dissonance
    • looking whether we might have missed the point
      • dissonance between intent and outcome
    • by finding dissonance we identify and resolve it 
    • we discover and force ourselves to think/problem solve/trouble shoot 
    • we revise in order to gain control 
  • feedback forces revision
    • and brings our own different perspective
  • think of how would approach a photo shoot/project/bow
    • not as intuitive with writing but essentially the same process


  • standing back and rewriting
  • structure
  • we cannot redraft without revision
  • redrafting is about finding resolution to dissonance
  • we cannot discover our arguments in our heads – it needs to come out – discovery
    • we write to discover 


  • comes at the end, before we submit
  • checking everything correct eg punctuation, referencing 
  • fine tuning/presentation/final touches
  • look at it for what it is not how it felt making it


taking someone’s idea and passing as your own – reference and there is no issue!

  • there is no original 
  • there can be a development that is original
  • nuance
    • can sound similar but may be fundamentally different
  • keep clear notes 
    • bibliography, paraphrase etc
      • avoids accidental plagiarism
  • ideas pivot on sources 
    • technique essential 
      • introduce – reference experiment – analysis – conclusions 
  • what is a quotation?
    • must be verbatim
    • can change grammar to flow but must show this
    • should only be used when succinct and eloquent, otherwise don’t quote
  • paraphrase
    • own words 
    • same level of detail from source 
  • summary
    • own words
    • brief description of idea where full detail not needed
  • summary/paraphrase help us understand concept better
    • writing through discovery
    • articulate in our own way
    • all need references
    • danger – merging own ideas with source – what they say with what they didn’t say
      • need control and safeguard 
  • too many references?
    • short text – how many can you have?
    • the golden balance – your argument – focus 
    • in our argument we only put what we need – nothing that is not crucial

Level 3 Tutor Group: 16th July 2021

Notes from Contextual Studies Level 3 Tutor Group session on 16th July 2021 with Ariadne Xenou:

  • The relationship between research and creativity – one is in a void without the other
  • Keep asking – what is the relevance to my practice? – only work when you have clarity about what you are pursuing
  • The problem of looking too much…
    • reflection
    • discussion
    • making sense for yourself
  • A3 pivotal assignment 
    • when things start to take shape
    • frequently does not come until feedback for A5
    • in order to achieve clarity – keep on keeping on, even if you are not sure what animal it is. Going through drafts, we discover (the more you write and engage)

What is creativity?

  • Value, comparison, judgement (Bakhtin?)
  • Communication to someone else – how is the work valuable to others?
  • has value
  • just making stuff
  • Fulfilling some sort of desire
  • Imagination, inner life, fulfilling fantasies – the desire to communicate
  • Why do we need to communicate to others? personal, authentic, say something personal and hopefully will resonate with others
  • Need to be open 
  • Even if something seems unique it is borrowed from somewhere else
  • We need to be able to contextualise work through research 
  • Creation does not happen in a void – all creativity comes from something else

Is creativity and research fundamentally different?

  • Essay itself is also a creative act
  • CS is about contextualising and understanding your own thoughts and development of thought 
  • Discovering things that make rise to the new
  • CS is about the creator understanding the depth of the work 
  • Although secondary sources are good ways into the subject, you must go to the primary sources
  • You need to get strict with the sources – damage control, what is the output? how much can be fit in reasonably? depth through word count  – not about the interesting alone but the relevant
  • Research is time consuming, opens so many paths – but eventually you need to choose your path
  • Assume no one is reading the blog…use it to synthesise info – only do things that are relevant – has to serve a purpose

AX recommendations  –

Bow and CS worth considering as 2 sections in a novel – although fundamentally different 

both are about telling stories, ultimately they will meet in some way – not to become the same but some different 2 other parts

Newcastle University 2021 Fine Art Degree Show

It was great to be back in an art gallery to see the 2021 Newcastle University Degree show at the Hatton Gallery. With 56 artists on show, this was a diverse and variable experience – viewing this amount of disparate work is quite fatiguing in itself. There was very little in the way of context or artists statements available which also made navigating the work difficult, and I wonder why this was decided. Certainly there is an argument about letting the work speak for itself, however, when the conceptual nature of art is so central to understanding, not giving the reader any direction is problematic – I certainly would have appreciated some guidance as a I varied the work and suspect my enjoyment of certain pieces would have been aided immeasurably by this.

Emily Render:
Emily Render presents a 45x45cm cube containing a fluorescent geometric design and mirrors, which when the viewer places their head inside the installation makes them feel like they are inside a kaleidoscope. The patterns seem to move and the experience is just on the right side of overwhelming. Render says this: “the work explores the dissonance and contradiction created when a limitless, sacred space is contained within a limited 3D object. Additionally, it is a reaction to claustrophobia induced pandemic isolation.” I definitely agree with this – it is a deceptively simple, highly effective work.
I was initially turned off by Ellie-Mae’s garish, confrontational artworks which overtly confront notions of fine art legitimacy. This work ‘POSH’ however, opened things up for me with part of the work containing what appears to be feedback for the artist from their tutor. It immediately made me confront the assumptions I had made about the work, perhaps Ellie-Mae expresses this best with these statements that amount to a manifesto: “i paint for me. i do not paint for academia. especially tutors. you do not get to decide what belongs in fine art. you do not get to decide the value of my art…fine art is overrated. middle-class white cubed spaces are overrated. tradition is overrated. Fuck your ‘fine’. make what you want.”
Georgia Robinson:
I found Georgia Robinson’s minimal and effective small pen and ink drawings of seemingly imagined spaces intriguing and they are the works I spent most time viewing. The small paintings need close inspection and much can be gained from looking backward and forward between them and the similarities and differences they contain. Robinson says this about the work: “I have been exploring my interest of interior design by creating vague interior spaces. Inspired by dreamscapes, I have created ambiguous interiors that allow the viewer to question what the purpose of the space is and who occupies it.”
Olivia Rose-Grey:
Olivia Rose-Grey presented two large circular photo collages which are full of detail and distortions. The images appear to show multiple selfies and reflections of identity. They are beautiful and intriguing to view in the gallery space and perhaps my favourite pieces in the exhibition, online reproduction does not do the works justice. Rose-Grey says this about her practice: “My work explores the dynamic between the photographer and subject, the performance of identity and representation of the self in the context of diminishing truth. I am particularly interested in the traditional connotations of both camera lens and the mirror as offering ‘truth’ or reality’, and ways in which to subvert this through the repeated presentation of a female image.”


Thoughts and Ideas for Level 3

As I start this final part of my OCA/degree journey, I feel a mixture of excitement, trepidation, and, an urge to dive head first into the course combined with a voice in the back of my mind telling me to hold back. Before I received the course material I felt confident and ready, excited to be in a position to become self directed in my practice and research. My last course, Digital Image and Culture has by far been my most positive experience with OCA. During the module I managed to put many demons to rest, or at least found strategies to cope with feelings of self doubt that have often been paralysing. I managed to find ways to become more productive and strike a happier balance between reading and making work – something that previously has been too skewed towards research. However, having the course manuals in my possession changed this – the road ahead suddenly seemed a bit too real. I hope that having now finished my assessment submission for DI&C these thoughts will dissipate – perhaps all I need to do is make a start?

This post is the first part of that process – I like to begin every course with my thoughts and ideas about what I am going to do, and since this strategy has helped in the past, it seems like a good idea to do the same now.

Below are some of my thoughts about what I want to do and achieve, in no particular order, far from comprehensive and possibly even to be discounted quickly. I plan to use the process of writing as a way to explore thoughts and ideas throughout the course, more details of which can be found below.

How to balance BoW and CS?

During DI&C I found my research began to inform my practice and vice versa, and although that was before I found myself in the position of studying two courses in tandem, I am hoping that to build on this way of working through level 3. The HE6 study groups I have managed to attend so far with Ariadne Xenou have helped with my expectations in this regard. Ariadne has been excellent at describing how theory should feed into practice and encourage a process of ruthlessly interrogating what we are doing. I made these notes from the meeting I attended in November 2020:

  • Carlo Ginsberg says – we mine the rubbish heap of our observations.
  • There are millions of observations – how do we control these?
    • allow some and exclude others.
    • this can only happen through the writing process –
      • the mining happens when you write.
    • writing is investigation/a means to understand and discover
      • through writing itself we decide what we think and how we interrelate information.

An approach of dividing study into days or weeks looking at either BoW or CS is unlikely to enable me to gain any traction. My hope is that I will organically find a way to bounce between the courses – indeed this is a necessity rather than a need as Ariadne is quite explicit in her view that this is the only way to be successful at level 3.

How to approach the coursework?

I need to remember the good habits I have built through DI&C and not fall back into bad ones, for example, doing too much reading that is ‘nice to do’ and taking away focus from what I should be engaging with. Having a free rein with these courses is potentially fraught with danger and I need to recognise when I am being led down rabbit holes. But I also do not want to disregard the course material completely – clearly it is designed to stimulate thought and action and I should embrace it as such. A complication in my belief that I just need to focus on the things that interest me is that if I had done this through DI&C I would have skipped over researching artists that did not immediately seem to appeal to me – once I learned more about their practice this was some of the work I found most inspiring through the course.

Possible themes for BoW

I would say I have a wide range of artistic influences ranging from the traditional to experimental and the more I learn about art the more ‘challenging’ my tastes become. And yet, I would describe the work I make as very much based in the real world, conventional even. Now there is nothing wrong with this…but…I do feel the need to push myself to make something more challenging than I have already, although I have no idea what that will be.

I have always been interested in photographing my local area and this is a theme I have returned to over many projects. My last assignment for Digital Image and Culture (The Loop) is an example of this and also the potential starting point for my BoW. It was very personal, although not overtly so, and contained images made within a few miles of my home. Continuing this exploration of my local area is important personally as I wish to continue with this as a theme, but is also a practical consideration as it will allow me the opportunity to make lots of images and try different approaches. A number of things made this project a success in my view:

  • The project developed organically, enabled by having an open mind to where experimentation would lead me.
  • I was able to explore broadly the same area over a sustained period – I followed the same walking route each day for 100 days and made images using my iPhone. The practical considerations working locally should not be underestimated.
  • I explored thoughts and feelings about my relationship with my local area in more detail than I have in the past and began addressing the duality of these, a combination of pride and despair, while considering my place in the community – and ideas about whether community even exists.

When I first became seriously interested in photography, it was documentary work that I looked at and admired. Since then my interests have become much more varied and I am not sure that a traditional ‘social documentary’ approach is one I want to take. The Loop is very much based in the real world, but, I would not classify it as a ‘straight’ photography project due to its autobiographical and personal nature. While I want to build on the momentum that this project has given me, I am also conscious that I do not want to just repeat the same thing. I also recognise that I am already thinking too far ahead to the the finished BoW which is at least 18 months away from realisation – I need to keep this in mind in order to remain level, pragmatic and patient.

Some thoughts I have about possible themes/concerns/things I am interested in:

  • Class/poverty/injustice/austerity/deprivation/marginalisation: something that the Covid-19 pandemic has shown is the deep divisions in society and how many people are truly struggling. I live in an area with a great deal of deprivation, but like anywhere it is a mix of different demographic and affluences and to focus solely on this would be a mistake. I have had to think and consider my own place in this as well. I have a managerial job with a good salary and a lifestyle I would consider privileged and comfortable. Am I equipped to make work about the deprivation in my area given that this is not the reality of my life? Is this even ethical? Perhaps one way would be working with people in the community, but as an outsider (economically not geographically) I am not sure. I read an excellent book Poverty Safari by Darren McGarvey recently, the title of the book refers to the phenomenon of well intentioned, but misguided, middle class people arriving in deprived areas in an attempt to help in some way without understanding/being able to understand the reality of life in these marginalised communities. In short, the inequality makes me angry, increasingly so, and if I do anything around this as a theme then I want it to be positive and not a fulfilment of stereotypes.
  • Community: This is really on my mind. What part in my community am I? What does community even mean? Perhaps this could be the theme of the work in itself? The idea of whether I am an insider or outsider would also be a consideration here.
  • Society: A loaded word since Thatcher’s infamous assertion that there is ‘no such thing…’ Again, fits into the same sort of territory as community but perhaps wider reaching. (In an HE6 tutor group I attended there was a discussion of grand narratives and micro histories – something I need to research further. In this case, the grand narrative would be an exploration of society and whatever work I eventually make would be the micro history.)
  • The North/Northerness: perhaps addressing some of the stereotypes of this or looking at how my identity is entangled with my geographical location.

Thoughts about research

Looking through the course material I am so glad that I chose Understanding Visual Culture as my last level one course – this means that I can dive straight into the concepts referenced in part one of CS without the steep learning curve that considering these for the first time demands. I need to think carefully about how much I go back over and refresh myself on though, and ensure that I do this in a focused way. Perhaps being selective about what I write about is the key as this is what takes the most time. This may be a strategy that helps me keep focus and make progress.


Looking at the work and conceptual strategies of different artists was one of the most stimulating parts of DI&C. I was also surprised by how much I was inspired by the work of artists I previously knew little about and may not have engaged with without the direction of the course material. Preparing for my level 3 progression meeting I made a long list of artists that I felt could inspire the direction of both BoW and CS. I decided not to share this as I reasoned that doing so could stifle my desire to develop my own artistic voice. However, one of the first things I intended to do starting level 3 was some more detailed research on these – it is only writing this now that it strikes me that the reasons I chose not to do this for my progression discussion are just as relevant now, perhaps more so. I will keep this list in my notes, add to it as I see work that interests me, but resist the urge to delve further unless I believe doing so would advance my BoW and CS in some way.


The potential audience for my eventual BoW is also on my mind along with concerns about how to present work to non-art audiences. This is something that will become more of an issue in SYP, but is also something I need to consider at this early part of the journey – it is my strong belief that art can be accessible whole being challenging without the need to be simplified and if my BoW is eventually to be presented in my home town I need to keep this in my mind so academia does not take over my thinking and approach.

It feels good to have this maiden post finished, even if I worry that much of it is rambling – the only way I will start to distill my ideas into something firmer than generalisations is by continuing with this way of working and thinking…so, here goes…

© 2021 Michael Millmore

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑